Eighteen original scenarios cover the twelve chapters and six essential cross-checks. Choose the single best answer using only the stated facts; numerical scenarios are invented. The result is a learning review, not a school examination, qualification or clearance for a real passage. Answers stay in this browser.
How to take the final self-check
The questions cover all 12 chapters. Choose one best answer, then check the whole test. You will see your choice, the explanation and a direct link to the chapter. Even a high percentage needs review if important misconceptions remain about warnings, data times, wave parameters or responsibility for a decision.
Each question has one best answer and is worth one point. Review the explanation and linked chapter after a mistake; a high score measures course understanding, not competence certification or the suitability of a real passage. Test progress and answers remain in this browser and are not submitted to the server.
Critical questions flag misconceptions that can materially distort a weather decision, such as unchecked warnings, expired information, Hs as a maximum, tide height as slack current or an AI safety clearance. Review every incorrect critical answer even when the total score is high; this flag is a learning aid, not an operational risk rating.
Final self-check
Choose the single best answer for every question. The check shows explanations, important gaps and chapters to revisit. Results stay in this tab: analytics are disabled on this page, answers are not sent and do not survive closing or refreshing it.
Automatic scoring requires JavaScript. You can still read the questions and check the explanations below without sending data.
1. Show explanation
High or rising pressure is not a calm-weather guarantee; retain the local wind evidence and wider pressure pattern. Wind is related to the spatial pressure gradient and other processes, not a single pressure number. High pressure can coexist with significant local wind, while rising pressure alone does not settle conditions. Use pressure as context alongside current route-specific information.
2. Show explanation
Compare both timings with fast and slow route progress, while checking chart validity and retaining the difference. Frontal timing uncertainty matters when it changes which exposed leg the yacht occupies. A chart sequence must be matched to valid times and realistic progress. Preserve the scenarios and test whether practical alternatives remain available.
3. Show explanation
Retain the 18-knot mean and 28-knot gust separately; a gust must not be relabelled as sustained Beaufort wind. The Beaufort wind-speed ranges describe mean wind, not the substitution of a short gust for the mean. The course's table places an 18-knot mean in force 5. Gusts still matter independently for yacht and crew preparation.
4. Show explanation
Convective outflow may precede rain; radar age limits the assessment, so prepare early and seek current information. Outflow is not restricted to the visible rain shaft and can arrive first. An aged image cannot supply an exact present cell position or clearance. State both the observation and its limitations rather than waiting for rain to validate the threat.
5. Show explanation
No; Hs is statistical, and larger individual waves are possible without a guaranteed maximum derived from Hs alone. Hs represents a statistical measure of sea state, not a cap on individual waves. Larger waves can occur, and their timing or upper bound is not determined by one Hs value. Period, direction, components and local transformation remain important too.
6. Show explanation
The applicable local stream direction, speed and slack reference, with its stated time basis and weather-wave interaction. Tide height and horizontal stream do not share a universal timing relationship. A tide race needs the appropriate local current product, not a neighbouring height table alone. Wind against stream and changing arrival time require their own assessment.
7. Show explanation
Check both route zones and relevant approaches and alternatives, retaining each product's issue, validity and warning status. Official products have defined geographical coverage. A complete route pack includes the zones occupied during the passage and locally appropriate approach information. Keep coverage and times explicit rather than silently extrapolating the start harbour's forecast.
8. Show explanation
Align location, valid time and parameter definitions; preserve reference runs and lead times so the comparison is meaningful. Different valid times describe different events, and different reference runs start with different information. Matching units alone is insufficient. Deliberate successive-run comparison is useful, but it must be labelled rather than confused with like-for-like model spread.
9. Show explanation
The expected change, wave entry, holding and exit conditions, plus a review trigger before the bay becomes unsuitable. Shelter can expire when the wind direction changes. Wave exposure and the feasibility of moving must be checked separately from present wind shelter. Assign the review and alternative before the crew becomes committed to the night stop.
10. Show explanation
Rehearse actual reception, verify coverage and settings, save an offline copy and define a fallback and missed-update response. A communications assumption is part of the weather decision, not a separate convenience. Test the channel and make sure another crew member can use it. A missed update must produce a visible information gap and reassessment, not a silently refreshed report.
11. Show explanation
It provides limited context only; check current convection, monitored disturbances, marine forecasts and relevant advisories. Trade-wind climatology is not a daily guarantee, and a disturbance can matter before a storm is named. Tropical planning needs several distinct information layers. Keep the checks tied to current products and the route rather than a broad regional impression.
12. Show explanation
Reject or correct the unsupported value, preserve the gap and check the calculation/source record before using the briefing. Every numerical weather statement needs traceable input and an applicable time and place. Language quality does not validate an invented field. AI should explain the evidence and unresolved limits, not silently supply missing meteorology.
13. Show explanation
Expired for that decision; obtain applicable current information and retain issue, validity and receipt as separate timestamps. A page refresh or receipt timestamp cannot extend the product's valid interval. The departure is outside the stated coverage. Show the expired state explicitly instead of presenting old content as current.
14. Show explanation
No; retain it as adverse evidence, check compatible datum and local relevance, and reassess with appropriate information near arrival. An observed-minus-predicted residual is evidence at a particular station and time. Weather effects can change spatially and through time, so an exact transfer is unsupported. It can inform an adverse scenario but must retain datum, timing and representativeness limits.
15. Show explanation
Current warning status unverified; retain the last successful check and obtain today's official information through a working channel. A past successful check cannot establish today's warning state. A failed current request is an information gap, not a negative result. Use an official working channel and keep the last check's source and time visible.
16. Show explanation
Current advisory and local warning text with valid times and hazard information; the old cone is neither current clearance nor the full impact area. The cone concerns the centre track and is tied to its issue; it does not represent all impacts. A new relevant warning changes the information available for the decision. Restore the current official picture and local instructions rather than carrying forward a saved graphic's reassurance.
17. Show explanation
It shows agreement within that ensemble for the compared feature, while shared error and unresolved local exposure remain possible. Spread measures differences among members, not every source of uncertainty. Members can share an error, and coarse terrain representation remains a separate limitation. Retain the agreed feature without extending it to unsupported local gusts or a safety guarantee.
18. Show explanation
Recompute the route-time exposure, obtain applicable updates, check alternatives and log the new evidence and decision. A timing change alters the forecast period and conditions encountered, especially at the approach. A briefing is a versioned basis for review, not a permanent clearance. Preserve what changed, when it was checked and the reasoning for the revised plan.
After the test
Revisit topics where you could not justify the answer. Then build a practice brief with sources, times, limits and an alternative. Compare your reasoning with the cases in chapter 12. A real passage still requires current products, navigation checks and practical skills; the test score cannot replace them.